A Note on the Straight-line Distances between the Fortresses of the Palantíri

 

 

The straight-line distances in the table in the main article are based upon careful examination and measurement of the large, fold-out maps found glued onto the back covers of hardback editions The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King.  However, there are other excellent maps as well, those produced by the late cartographer of fantasy stories, Karen Wynn Fonstad, in her Atlas of Middle-earth.[1]  Fonstad’s Atlas is an outstanding resource for students of Tolkien, including the day-by-day movements and distances of each of the main characters in the story and highly detailed maps that Fonstad prepared.

 

Those maps are somewhat at variance with the large fold-out maps prepared for the novel.  Careful examination and measurement of the maps in Atlas produces a somewhat different estimate of the distances between the various fortresses of the palantíri. 

 

Here are the estimates derived from the large fold-out maps, the same as those in the main article which pointed to this page:

miles between strongholds

Elostirion

Annúminas

Fornost Erain

Amon Sûl

Orthanc / Angrenost

Minas Anor

Osgiliath

Minas Ithil / Morgul

Barad-Dûr

Elostirion

147

239

326

601

1,036

1,064

1,089

1,165

Annúminas

147

100

222

587

1,004

1,029

1,051

1,111

Fornost Erain

239

100

142

548

945

969

989

1,041

Amon Sûl

326

222

142

422

806

829

849

899

Orthanc / Angrenost

601

587

548

422

439

469

495

590

Minas Anor

1,036

1,004

945

806

439

33

63

199

Osgiliath

1,064

1,029

969

829

469

33

29

168

Minas Ithil / Morgul

1,089

1,051

989

849

495

63

29

141

Barad-dûr

1,165

1,111

1,041

899

590

199

168

141

 

Here are the estimate derived from Fonstad’s Atlas:

Miles

Elostirion

Annúminas

Fornost Erain

Amon Sûl

Orthanc / Angrenost

Minas Anor

Osgiliath

Minas Ithil / Morgul

Barad-Dûr

Elostirion

165

251

339

619

1,080

1,085

1,096

1,157

Annúminas

165

100

227

608

1,047

1,050

1,057

1,107

Fornost Erain

251

100

140

558

978

980

985

1,030

Amon Sûl

339

227

140

436

841

842

846

889

Orthanc / Angrenost

619

608

558

436

466

473

487

561

Minas Anor

1,080

1,047

978

841

466

18

43

141

Osgiliath

1,085

1,050

980

842

473

18

25

123

Minas Ithil / Morgul

1,096

1,057

985

846

487

43

25

98

Barad-dûr

1,157

1,107

1,030

889

561

141

123

98

 

Here are the differences between the two estimates.  The differences are always Fonstad’s map less the maps published with the novels.

difference

Elostirion

Annúminas

Fornost Erain

Amon Sûl

Orthanc / Angrenost

Minas Anor

Osgiliath

Minas Ithil / Morgul

Barad-Dûr

Elostirion

 

-18

-12

-13

-18

-44

-21

-7

7

Annúminas

-18

 

0

-5

-22

-44

-20

-6

5

Fornost Erain

-12

0

 

2

-11

-33

-10

4

11

Amon Sûl

-13

-5

2

 

-14

-35

-12

2

9

Orthanc / Angrenost

-18

-22

-11

-14

 

-27

-4

8

30

Minas Anor

-44

-44

-33

-35

-27

 

15

20

58

Osgiliath

-21

-20

-10

-12

-4

15

 

4

45

Minas Ithil / Morgul

-7

-6

4

2

8

20

4

 

43

Barad-dûr

7

5

11

9

30

58

45

43

 

 

The table of differences show that Fonstad’s map places Elostirion on the Emyn Beraid 18 miles closer to Annúminas on Lake Nenuial than the large maps published with the novels.  Fonstad’s map has Minas Morgul 20 miles farther from Minas Tirith (Anor) than the large maps published with the novels.  The sum of all these distances is a total reduction of 220 miles for 10 sites, or an average of about 22 fewer miles between each site. 

 

Throughout the essay, whenever I have referenced distances between two sites, I have used the distances estimated from the large, fold-out maps published with the novels.  This does not in any way diminish the excellent work that Fonstad produced in her Atlas, but rather a preference to stay as close as possible to original publication. 

 

 

For those of you who are curious, the average of these two methods produces this result.

average of Tolkien and Fonstad

Elostirion

Annúminas

Fornost Erain

Amon Sûl

Orthanc / Angrenost

Minas Anor

Osgiliath

Minas Ithil / Morgul

Barad-Dûr

Elostirion

156

245

332

610

1058

1075

1092

1161

Annúminas

156

100

224

598

1025

1040

1054

1109

Fornost Erain

245

100

141

553

962

975

987

1035

Amon Sûl

332

224

141

429

823

835

847

894

Orthanc / Angrenost

610

598

553

429

452

471

491

575

Minas Anor

1058

1025

962

823

452

26

53

170

Osgiliath

1075

1040

975

835

471

26

27

145

Minas Ithil / Morgul

1092

1054

987

847

491

53

27

120

Barad-dûr

1161

1109

1035

894

575

170

145

120

 

The average distance between each site is 608 miles; for the large fold-out maps published with the novels, it would be 619 miles (608 + 22/2 = 608 + 11 = 619); and for Fonstad’s maps, it would be 597 miles.

 

Again, these are straight-line distances, not the distances that a traveler would have to walk, or ride between two points.  For those figures, I commend Fonstad’s “Pathways” table in Atlas of Middle-earth,[2] which gives the date, hours of travel, distance traveled in mileage, rate of travel in miles per hour, and terminal position at the end of the day, along with a brief comment on each move. 

 

Merely averaging the two method does not necessarily produce a better result, but can produce a muddled one: for any single essay or exercise, it is better to pick one or the other of the sets of maps and stick to that.  For this essay, I have chosen the large fold-out maps published with the novels; but for work that requires day-to-day examinations of the movements of the characters, Fonstad’s maps would be the better choice.

 

If, however, it is your goal to get a good, general idea of how far apart various places may be in order to get a sense of distance in the story, the averaged distances might suit better than either alone.

 

 



[1] I am using the 1991 first edition for this discussion.  There is a revised edition of Atlas of Middle-earth.

[2] This is found on pp 156–161 of my edition.